A
This is true. In such cases the relationship is said to have "optionality".
close B
The primary key field may NEVER be null. Don't be so stupid!
close C
Third normal form is certainly desirable, however relations which are
only in first normal form may be stored in a relational database.
close D
Many to many mappings may be represent - usually by introducing
an extra table of "pairs".
close E
This restriction is not general. Some implementations (notably
dBase III) require primary key fields to be adjacent.
close
Which of the following statements concerning relational databases is true?
A foreign key field may be null.
A primary key field may be null
All relations must be in at least third normal form
Many to many mappings cannot be represented
The primary key fields of a relation must be adjacent
|